Monday, December 20, 2010

Highjack Nation: Politics '10

This has been the year of the highjack. Not foreign terrorists - thinking enemies of the US realize they needn't devastate 'their' folk in other lands just to have our lives and resources wasted by wars modeled on the Vietnam 'conflict' ('our' of course here meaning the majority of US citizens, not the globalist plutocrats who make incalulably great worldly profits), yet without the naive fear-faith in the Domino Theory or the misguided (deals with the devil; Moloch-sacrifices) agendae of promoting prosperity and full employment, paying for the Great Society, and making disciplined (or dead) men out of 'matriarchially raised' delinquents. If you really hate the real US, what could give you more glee than beholding it bleeding with exquisite but inexorable slowness, the osmotic haemorrhage at the borders and the transfusion of our strength to the new Free Trade/New Liberalism/NAFTA plutocrats of foreign slave labor sweatshops and industrialized farms and forests. Peruse these examples:


 Click here: "highjacked the Tea Party" - Forestle

 
 
You get the idea.  Try some searches yourself. 
 
The elected Teeps are galloping for pork for their own troughs; they've already wallowed in 'special interest' and freelance lobbyist lucre to get elected.  Rand Paul has traded Daddy's old antiwar libertarianism for loopy AquaBuddha gun-thuggery (Ms Palin's also handy with a truncheon).  Michelle Bachman is a crankup-tape robo-zombie... there's Mouse-Brain Girl, and so many more.
 
So much more from Bam, too.  What a record!  I'm waiting for him to twist the rails on the DADT repeal somehow, just to be consistent in taking his election platform sworn principles and turning them into the mail-order cures used by Wile E. Coyote.  HOPE?  Bye-bye.  Here comes the anvil and the express train!   
 
 



You get the idea. Try search variations. Happy happy! ~>gag<~

Saturday, December 4, 2010

1890-2010 in Film (0-End Years)

Okay, here is the short reference form for what I did last year. 2010 doesn't seem to compare to previous anniversary years, however, the awesomeness factor of years before 1950 rests most greatly in the BIRTHS section. Maybe the future (gulp! Such as it may be - and it seems a particularly bad time to be bringing tender innocents into this Thunder of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and I Don't Mean the Movies world) will be far kinder than it seems we can reasonably expect just now, and those who take their first breath in 2010 will twinkle as bright as their screen forebears of the nought-end years!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1890_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1910_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1920_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1930_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1930_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1940_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1990_in_film seems like just a few years ago to me!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_in_film

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_in_film

Condemning Helen Thomas

Click here: Wayne State University Scraps Helen Thomas Award After Remarks About 'Zionists'


http://www.aolnews.com/discuss/wayne-state-university-scraps-helen-thomas-award-after-remarks-about-zionists/19746449#gcpDiscussPageUrlAnchor=&gcpCommentsWidget%5Bp%5D=2&gcpCommentsWidget%5Bs%5D=new

Helen Thomas is as Semitic as any Israeli. 'Semite' derives from Old Testament usage: See Genesis 10 and 1 Chronicles 1. It is given as one of the 3 post-diluvian root races of mankind, the others being 'Japhetic' and 'Hamitic'. What we think of as physical markers of 'race' nowadays NEVER properly applied to this, though there have been ages of ignorant and maliciously agendaed misapplications to that notion. These very Biblical accounts show that these 'races' mixed from prehistoric times. These racial terms became applied, with ironically UNscientific promiscuity, by 'linguistic scientists' to language groups, which much further tangled and perverted 'scientific' study of race (at the same time that the money was all on conquest and colonialism). 'Japhetic' had been used for 'Euroid' and 'Mongoloid' racial types and thus didn't work for languages; pseudochristian racists took the linguistic term 'Aryan' (originally Caspian nomads of a warlike bent who GOT AROUND and even left us with the names 'Iran' and 'Erin'), a.k.a. 'Indo-European', ditched the mahogany-skinned Indics from the equation, and worked on a mythology of Nordic Vedic primordial superfolk that Hitler combined with 'population control' and turned into monstrous bloody 'scientific' doctrine...

...With results so horrific - and within living memory - that one dares not posit (for instance) that the principles of social control delineated in 'the Protocols' (no matter how strongly and eloquently the same may argue that they were FALSELY attributed to a 'Jewish Conspiracy') have actually been effected, or that there is no difference in criticizing (a) Zionism (b) the State of Israel (c) any individual Jews, Jewish sodalities, or even any politicians, preachers, etc., friendly to anything that might be considered 'Jewish interests'... Without the one who so dares to speak risking (EVEN IF THE DARER IS JEWISH) of being 'anti-Jewish' or the term that is ridiculous when applied to speakers of the Semitic tongue Arabic, or from the 'racial' heritage of the ancient lands most associated with the 'Children of Shem' (the Near East), 'anti-Semitic'.

This problem of intelligent discourse on matters vital to the World goes far beyond PC wrangling on 'is it all right to say the N word or the Q work or the C word if it's about your own group?' Any rational and fair-minded person can see that, if there is a bad ol' Milton Friedman there's a courageous Naomi Klein, and for every war-profiteering financier with a Jewish name there have been innumerable Jewish philanthropists and innocent scapegoat-victims of every level of bigotry.

Jews, like Italians, can justly claim an extra - even DOMINANT - measure, among humanity, of being excellent in all things. They have excelled in good things, but also, some of them, in evil things as well. For all they have rendered to the World, Italians, Chinese, Arabs, British, Indians, Americans, etc., have been both properly praised and censured. This is JUST. Whether 'Caesar's wives' in history or the Turkish government in the present day, the idea that something must be 'beyond reproach' turned into a euphemism for 'above the law' only works to put the worst things that might be attributed to some in the protected group into such a spotlight (whether from righteously indignant revelators or from maliciously self-righteous hypocrites) that all the good from the protected is shrivelled and covered in shade. One can hardly even say how successful (those separate entities) Jews and Israel have been, without a question of having said it as resentfully as Arab-American Thomas. This morbid excess of protection has woefully fed the filthy virus of hatred resurging against Jews and Israel and their friends today.

For Goodness's sake, let us all just try to be FAIR.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Reason behind the Wikileak?

Cherchez la 'Deep Throat'!  Such fuss over the latest big Wikileak (valid if it actually endangers innocent and well-meaning folk a la the Valerie Plame outing) - otherwise, give us a break.  Shades of Mike Wallace's weekly shocked, shocked-I-say indignation-fits on the old 60 Minutes.  Who, with a passing familiarity of history, Machiavelli, or even adventure novels and screen-stuff, would really find occasion to make O-mouths on what has always been not-for-publication realpolitik-as-usual?

Don't really believe Julian Assange, Aussie hacker-king with Eurotrash affect to match his name, got all that stuff on his own, didja?  Don't think he'd really get away with what he does with nothing more than a couple of highly-doubtful Scandy-candy adult-molestation charges, doya?

Somebody(s) on the inside of keeping secrets had to have arranged it all.  If traitors - you could turn around the Starship Enterprise in that hole in security and sail it to Oz decked in Christmas lights... Or, it was INTENTIONAL by allegedly-our-side:

This article may be The Reason Why:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/11/29/frum.wikileaks.iran/index.html  a.k.a
Click here: WikiLeaks builds case against Iran - CNN.com by David Frum.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

The Final Arbiters

We're given learned-sounding decision-quotes for the news media and history venues... Now I wonder if the black-robes have those ghosted for them by their flacks.  Read this for a revelation of the pertanence, maturity, and selfless sense of honor and duty practiced by the present archons of SCOTUS, the folks who brought you assurance, in the name of the Constitution of the United States, that corporations are persons and that, essentially, they are more important than, y'know, old-fashioned flesh-& heartbeat persons when it comes to representing the 'public interest' to force sales for public domaining.  A transcript of how they really speak and operate, and example of their level of intelligent inquiry:
http://www.joystiq.com/2010/11/03/schwarzenegger-vs-ema-the-recap/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl4%7Csec1_lnk2%7C182026  

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

RE-ELECT WILL ROGERS!

Have we ever had this many obviously-crazies up for major seats with such a big chance of winning them, before?
National 'Mid-Term Election Day', All Saints But Not on Your Ballot Day, 2010

No nuttier than actually electing current whack-jobs for your rulers today is electing dead guys, so:  The lates ~ great jester and his honorable 'Jr' (also WP Adair, his namesake):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Penn_Adair_Rogers

snips (but read the whole article & some of its links:


'He wrote frequently for the mass-circulation upscale magazine Saturday Evening Post, where Rogers advised Americans to embrace the frontier values of neighborliness and democracy on the domestic front while remaining clear of foreign entanglements.

Presidential campaign, 1928:

Rogers thought all campaigning was bunk. To prove the point he mounted a mock campaign in 1928 for the presidency. His only vehicle was the pages of Life, a weekly humor magazine. Rogers ran as the "bunkless candidate" of the Anti-Bunk Party. His only campaign promise was that, if elected, he would resign. Every week, from Memorial Day through Election Day, Rogers caricatured the farcical humors of grave campaign politics. On election day he declared victory and resigned.

What does the farmer need? Obvious: "He needs a punch in the jaw if he believes that either of the parties cares a damn about him after the election" (August 23).

Can voters be fooled? Darn tootin': "Of all the bunk handed out during a campaign the biggest one of all is to try and compliment the knowledge of the voter" (September 21).

What about a candidate's image? Ballyhoo: "I hope there is some sane people who will appreciate dignity and not showmanship in their choice for the presidency" (October 5).

What of ugly campaign rumors? Don't worry: "The things they whisper aren't as bad as what they say out loud" (October 12).[20]

"The average citizen knows only too well that it makes no difference to him which side wins. He realizes that the Republican elephant and the Democratic donkey have come to resemble each other so closely that it is practically impossible to tell them apart; both of them make the same braying noise, and neither of them ever says anything. The only perceptible difference is that the elephant is somewhat the larger of the two.[28]

"Every guy just looks in his own pocket and then votes. And the funny part of it is that it's the last year of an administration that counts. [A president] can have three bad ones and then wind up with everybody having money in the fourth, and the incumbent will win so far he needn't even stay up to hear the returns. Conditions win elections, not speeches.[29]

"One sure certainty about our Memorial Days is that as fast as the ranks from one war thin out, the ranks from another take their place. Prominent men may run out of Decoration Day speeches, but the world never runs out of wars. People talk peace, but men give up their life's work to war.[30]

"Everything is changing. People are taking the comedians seriously and the politicians as a joke."

"Our foreign policy is an open book - a checkbook."

"The income tax has made more liars out of Americans than golf."[31]

"If stupidity got us in this mess, why can't it get us out?"

"Everybody says this here thing we're involved in ain't a real war. Congress says it ain't a war. The President says it ain't a war. 'Course the guys over here getting shot at say it's the best damned imitation they ever saw."

"A senator got up today in Congress and called his fellow senators sons of wild jackasses. Now, if you think the senators were hot, imagine how the jackasses must feel."

Friday, October 22, 2010

Pitfalling My Way Through Un-PC Ravine...

I tried to add/reply to  my own post ('China Holds Mortgage -' down a ways), but that didn't work, and it went here as a post, so I might as well just leave it.

I don't really want to be a bigot, but these questions and feelings just occur.  As Sr Aloysius cried, 'I doubt! I DOUBT!!'  Woe is we.

'...and, yes, I know that there are many races / subracial types, in the morphological / physical / genetic sense...'  Unlike current Tea Party Repub Senate candidate Sharron 'BS & Backtracking' Angle, who's presently trying to spin her way out of challenging the propriety of a Hispanic interest group in her audience, because a lot of them looked Asian to her.  We are so schizoid, so multifariously whack on the subject of RACE.  How can we make any progress when the word itself, and all that pertains to it, is so individually understood (in the sense of being pertinently different in concept to how the same is understood by others, especially if those others aren't just tunnel-visioned 'truthiness' raging bigots)?  It doesn't help for airy idealists to try to wish it away, or for one bunch of scientist to say that DNA scientists prove it's an illusion while others (calling Prof. Gates and his TV show -among others!) use DNA markers to 'prove' you're this or that much of some 'race' because you had ancestors who sometime clustered and bred on one of three continents... Even though all those continents have always, in human history and prehistory, have each had folk of the full span of human coloration and morphology...Which is one way we mean 'race', while (especially outside the present English-speaking world), the word has like been used to mean 'ethnicity as national/tribal affiliation and culture'.  We all just don't know what we really mean by 'race'.

I wonder if this is true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwanese_aboriginals
'Reports from American envoys and others suggest that Taiwanese aboriginals under Qing rule were treated extremely harshly. Presbyterian missionary George Leslie Mackay in From far Formosa (1896) reported that "if a savage is killed inland, the heart is eaten, flesh taken off in strips, and bones boiled to a jelly and preserved as a specific for malarial fever" (Mackay 1896:276). American consul James W. Davidson described in The Island of Formosa (1903) how the Han Chinese in Taiwan ate and traded in their aboriginal victims' flesh (Davidson 1903:255), a practice also mentioned by Owen Rutter in Through Formosa (1923), whose account bears some similarities to Davidson's (Rutter 1923:224–225). Sangren, in History and Magical Power in a Chinese Community (1987) mentions Davidson's account, adding that elderly Ta-ch'i informants had corroborated his claims (Sangren 1987:223).'
Soooooooooooooo un-PC of me (and the above 'Yellow Peril' era quotes may be abominable false witness for political agendae) but it does seem that what (used to?) be called 'the Mongoloid Race' has tended to slip a little more easily into exigent or inimical cannibalism than the other so-called 'races'.  If this is so, I wonder if it might be because 'race scientists' have said the characteristic 'Mongoloid' morphology originated as adjustments to arctic conditions:  Which until recent times = a long season of STARVATION.  (We know that the tall, pale, hairy, beaky-nosed 'Euroids' of Scandinavia and Russia went Androphagi in the same circumstances) This might well also relate to the comparative lack of food taboos had by Mongoloid people, particularly the frequent cultural readiness to eat dogs, cats, and primates, which other races tend to think of as 'family member' species.